ArticleMethodsX2026
A community sensitive mixed-methods protocol for parental reporting of child sexual abuse.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a community sensitive mixed methods protocol for studying parental reporting of child sexual abuse. The protocol combines a brief school based cross sectional survey among parents with service linked in-depth interviews involving parents of affected children. It was developed to address a common limitation in child sexual abuse reporting research, namely the separation of community level reporting attitudes from case based family experiences. The protocol uses a low burden four item survey and semi-structured interview guide. The two strands are integrated at the interpretation stage through a narrative joint display that compares normative endorsement of reporting with lived reporting barriers. The protocol specifies the quantitative multistage random sampling procedure, participant flow, qualitative case access involving parents of affected children, thematic coding procedures, and concrete examples of mixed-methods integration to strengthen reproducibility. The protocol is designed to be feasible, ethically sensitive, and reproducible in community and low-resource settings. It may be useful for researchers seeking to study discrepancies between support for formal reporting in principle and the practical difficulties families face when abuse is disclosed.•Combines community based parent surveying with service linked parental interviewing in one ethically structured design.•Uses a brief reporting attitudes instrument and a domain based interview guide to generate complementary forms of evidence.•Provides a replicable workflow for recruitment, safeguarding, qualitative analysis, and mixed methods integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.