ArticleEmergency medicine international2026
Retrospective Analysis of eFAST Exams to Detect COVID-19 in Trauma Patients.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Analysis of eFAST Exams to Detect COVID-19 in Trauma Patients.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This original research study evaluates the utility of pulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) exam to detect asymptomatic COVID-19 in emergency department trauma patients. Specifically, it examines whether lung findings, such as B-lines, pleural thickening, and subpleural consolidations, can indicate a COVID-19 infection. Methods: This retrospective review includes trauma patients aged 18 years or older who underwent eFAST and COVID-19 swab testing at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center, from December 2020 to October 2022. Two blinded reviewers analyzed eFAST scans for more than two B-lines, irregular pleural interface, or subpleural consolidations, with discrepancies resolved by ultrasound fellows. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 152 patients were included. Of 41 eFAST scans positive for COVID-19 findings, six were confirmed by PCR testing, yielding a positive predictive value of 15.6% (CI: 7.9%-25.6%). Among the 111 eFAST scans negative for COVID-19, 10 were PCR-positive, giving a negative predictive value of 91.0% (CI: 84.1%-95.6%). Sensitivity was 37.5% (CI: 15.2%-64.6%), and specificity was 74.3% (CI: 66.1%-81.4%). Conclusion: Lung POCUS within the eFAST exam is not a reliable tool for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in trauma patients due to limited sensitivity and low positive predictive value. Standard diagnostic methods, such as PCR testing, and the use of personal protective equipment should remain the primary approach to protect healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.