ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
A point-based laminitis risk scoring system and machine learning framework for prediction of laminitis in horses.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laminitis is a painful and potentially life-threatening inflammatory condition of the equine hoof, and its detection remains a major challenge in veterinary practice. Although several risk factors have been reported, the prediction of the onset of laminitis in a subclinical stage using routine clinical data is still limited. This study aims to address this gap by developing an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework for the prediction of the risk of laminitis in horses. A point-based risk scoring system was first constructed using multivariate logistic regression to quantify the contribution of clinical, physiological, and conformational variables. Subsequently, this statistical model was combined with multiple ML classifiers to improve predictive performance. Explainability techniques, including ELI5 and feature importance analysis, were applied to each model to improve transparency and support the clinical interpretation of their predictions. Among the nine classifiers evaluated, SVM achieved the highest F1-score of 0.858 ± 0.152 and MCC of 0.811 ± 0.211, with TabPFN recording the highest AUC of 0.932 ± 0.094 and Random Forest achieving the highest precision of 0.917 ± 0.180. The risk scores reached maximum values of up to 0.97, with the lameness examination right fore (LERF), hoof testers right hind (HTRH), digital pulses, rectal temperature, and age identified as the most influential predictors across all evaluated classifiers. In general, the results demonstrate that the integration of statistical risk modeling with interpretable ML enables an accurate and clinically meaningful assessment of laminitis risk. The proposed approach provides a practical decision-support tool that may help veterinarians in preventive management and improve the results of equine welfare. All the source code is available at github.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.