Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555196›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2026

Sustained seizure reduction, treatment simplification, and high retention with cenobamate: A 12-month real-world study in refractory and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy.

Francesca Cutropia, Maria Teresa Di Claudio, Marta Robustella, Umberto Costantino, Carmela Pia Ferro, Giuseppe Miscio, Elena Conte, Nicola Amoroso, Orazio Nicolotti, Cosimo Damiano Altomare and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesca CutropiaDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Maria Teresa Di ClaudioNeurology Unit-Epilepsy Center, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Marta RobustellaNeurology Unit-Epilepsy Center, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Umberto CostantinoNeurology Unit-Epilepsy Center, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-4137
Carmela Pia FerroNeurology Unit-Epilepsy Center, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Giuseppe MiscioMedicina Trasfusionale e Laboratorio Analisi, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Elena ConteDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Nicola AmorosoDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Orazio NicolottiDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Cosimo Damiano AltomareDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-5805
Massimo CarellaUOC Genetica Medica, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Antonella LiantonioDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Paola ImbriciDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-5350
Giuseppe d'OrsiNeurology Unit-Epilepsy Center, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the 12-month clinical impact of cenobamate (CNB) in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in clinical practice, exploring whether outcomes differed according to prior antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure.

methodsThis single-center, retrospective, observational, real-world study included 91 adults stratified by the number of prior ASMs: ≤ 6 prior ASMs (n = 44) and > 6 prior ASMs (n = 47). Outcomes assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months included monthly seizure frequency, seizure freedom, retention rate, CNB dose, concomitant ASM burden, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

resultsIn the overall cohort, mean monthly seizure frequency decreased from 28.77 at baseline to 22.73 (3 months), 19.37 (6 months), and 14.58 (12 months), representing mean reductions of 21%, 33%, and 49%, respectively. Seizure freedom was achieved by 12% (11/91) of patients at 3 months, 13% (11/87) at 6 months, and 19% (16/82) at 12 months. Treatment retention rate was 100% at 3 months, 95.6% at 6 months, and 90.1% at 12 months. Both subgroups showed clinical benefit, but outcomes were more favorable in patients with ≤ 6 prior ASMs, who had a lower baseline seizure burden and higher 12-month seizure freedom than those with > 6 prior ASMs (29% vs. 10%). At 12 months, most patients were receiving CNB doses of 200 mg or higher, and 79% were maintained on ≤ 2 concomitant ASMs. Overall, 38.5% (35/91) of patients reported at least one ADR (most frequently somnolence, vertigo, and asthenia). SIGNIFICANCE: In this real-world cohort of adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, CNB was associated with sustained seizure reduction, high 12-month retention rate, and acceptable tolerability, while most patients were maintained on a low concomitant ASM burden during follow-up. Improvement was observed even in highly treatment-experienced patients, although outcomes were more favorable in those with lower prior ASM burden, supporting the hypothesis that earlier CNB positioning may provide greater efficacy.

Indexed as

cenobamatelow‐dose efficacypolytherapy de‐escalationrefractory epilepsyretentionultra‐refractory epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID42555196
PMCPMC13440508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.