Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555147›Full record

ArticleInfant mental health journal2026

Changes in parenting representations following Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) at an Australian Early Parenting Center.

Jerrica Kuan, Anna-Lisa Camberis, Adam Johns, Jane Kohlhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jerrica KuanDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3040-4624
Anna-Lisa CamberisDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1977-4822
Adam JohnsDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-7443
Jane KohlhoffDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-6685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Circle of Security-Parenting program (COS-P) is a widely disseminated attachment and mentalization-informed parenting intervention. Outcome studies, however, have yielded mixed results and its effectiveness for parents from different demographic groups is largely unknown. This study examined the outcomes of COS-P and explored parent demographics (mother/father status and education). Participants were 117 parents who attended COS-P at an Australian Early Parenting Center. The Composite Caregiving Questionnaire (CCQ) assessed caregiving representations (self-efficacy regarding emotion/affection and empathy/understanding, hostility, caregiving helplessness, and parental reflective functioning). Outcomes were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures design. Results revealed significant post-intervention improvement on all CCQ domains, with some demographic differences. Fathers reported a greater rate of improvement in parental self-efficacy regarding empathy and understanding compared to mothers, after starting from a lower level. There were no differences in any outcomes between parents who were university-educated and those who were not. Findings provide further evidence that COS-P improves caregiving representations, but there may be some differences for mothers and fathers.

Indexed as

MentalizationParentingParentsAdultAustraliaEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleObject AttachmentParent-Child RelationsSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnairescaregiving representationscircle of security parenting programcomposite caregiving questionnaireparental reflective functioningparent demographic factors

Identifiers

PMID42555147
PMCPMC13440330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.