ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Genome evolution and long-term demographic history in true crocodiles.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reference-quality genomes remain scarce for true crocodiles (Crocodylus), limiting comparative analyses of genome evolution and demographic history. Here, we generated and analyzed 2 long-read genomes, 1 for Crocodylus intermedius and 1 for C. niloticus, to investigate genome architecture, coalescent effective population size (Ne), and patterns of molecular evolution across crocodilians. Comparative analyses revealed broadly similar repeat landscapes in both species and extensive macro-synteny with Alligator sinensis, indicating strong structural conservation across crocodilian genomes. Using phased diploid assemblies and MSMC2, we reconstructed historical Ne trajectories and found marked differences between species. Crocodylus intermedius exhibited persistently low Ne throughout most of the late Quaternary, with a pronounced decline during the Late Pleistocene-early Holocene transition. In contrast, C. niloticus showed substantially larger Ne over comparable time intervals. Genome-wide codon-based analyses identified significant heterogeneity in dN/dS (ω) among crocodilian lineages. Crocodylus niloticus showed the lowest genome-wide ω, whereas elevated values in C. intermedius and other lineages were consistent with reduced long-term efficacy of purifying selection under smaller historical population sizes. Branch-site tests identified candidate genes under positive selection in both focal species, with functional categories related to ion transport, endocrine regulation, and cellular signaling. Together, these results provide genomic resources for Crocodylus and support an association between long-term demographic history and genome-wide patterns of molecular evolution across crocodilians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.