Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42554986›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Acoustic and Multimodal Deterrents to Limit Invasive Fish Passage.

Allen F Mensinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Allen F MensingerDepartment of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812, USA.

Funding

ENRTFLCCMR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic deterrents have been deployed with variable success to decrease fish interactions with anthropogenic hazards (i.e., power plant intakes and spillways) and prevent the spread of invasive species. Acoustic deterrents are nonphysical barriers that offer many advantages in that sound can travel a great distance, are relatively independent of light and weather conditions, do not interfere with navigation and are relatively inexpensive to implement. Assessing the efficacy of deterrents is challenging as there are few controlled or long-term studies and many reports fail to specify sound parameters (i.e., intensity, frequency) preventing independent assessment. It is imperative to factor fish sensory physiology when designing nonphysical deterrents as fish need to detect, localize, and move away from the stimulus. The auditory sensitivity of the target species must be identified to optimize the acoustic stimulus and the ambient soundscape mapped to ensure the sound intensity will be effective. Animals may habituate to an aversive stimulus and therefore multimodal deterrents may prove more effective than single-modal systems. This paper will provide an overview of acoustic deterrents, species targeted, and their efficacy. Special emphasis will be given to efforts to block the upstream migration of invasive bigheaded carp in the Mississippi River basin that currently threatens the Laurentian Great Lakes. Recent studies using a multimodal acoustic deterrent that conditions fish to associate sound with carbon dioxide will be described.

Indexed as

AcousticsConservation of Natural ResourcesFishesIntroduced SpeciesAnimal MigrationAnimalsSound

Identifiers

PMID42554986
PMCPMC13539453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.