SynthesisAdvances in therapy2026
Impact of Loco-regional Anaesthetic Techniques Versus General Anaesthesia in Women Aged ≥ 65 Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWomen aged ≥ 65 with multiple comorbidities are at increased risk of perioperative complications, loco-regional anaesthetic techniques (LRA) may reduce perioperative complications compared to general anaesthesia (GA); however, evidence specific to patients aged ≥ 65 is limited.
methodsA systematic search was conducted using Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science from database inception to 7 April 2025. Studies comparing LRA to GA, with any number of women aged ≥ 65 undergoing primary breast cancer surgeries, were included.
resultsEight studies with a total of 255,088 women, of whom 55,310 were aged ≥ 65, were included. Four studies were prospective and four were retrospective. 192,453 women received GA. Four studies compared local anaesthesia alone (number of women aged ≥ 65, n = 54,852) to GA, and one study each compared local + regional anaesthesia (n ≥ 65 = 389), pectoral nerve blocks (n ≥ 65 = 42), paravertebral block (n ≥ 65 = 26) and thoracic epidural (n ≥ 65 = 1) to GA. Overall, LRA techniques had lower rates of post-operative nausea and vomiting, confusion and operative duration.
conclusionsLRA may have a role in patients who are unfit for or cannot undergo GA for breast cancer surgery; however, data specific to women ≥ 65 years are sparse and there are many confounding factors which impact usability of LRA techniques, for example type of breast and axillary surgery and availability of technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.