Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42554867›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026

Perioperative intravenous lidocaine for gastrointestinal recovery and pain control in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Maria Eduarda Caetano Batista de Paiva, Francisco José Lucena Bezerra, Lucas Teixeira Baldo, Denis Maltz Grutcki, Alice Oliveira de Almeida, Vinícius Fernandes Sarmento, Matheus Arraes

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Eduarda Caetano Batista de PaivaFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Alameda Ezequiel Dias, 275, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-110, Brazil. mariaduducbp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9083-8116
Francisco José Lucena BezerraHospital São Luiz Itaim, Dr. Alceu de Campos Rodrigues St, 95, São Paulo, SP, 04544-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4152-4711
Lucas Teixeira BaldoInstituto de Cirurgia do Lago -Brasília, Shis Qi 5, 09 - Block E - Lago Sul, Brasília, DF, 71625-055, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6045-9768
Denis Maltz GrutckiHCA Florida University, 3476 S University Dr, Davie, FL, 33328, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5341-4891
Alice Oliveira de AlmeidaZarns School of Medicine, Luís Viana Filho Av, 3230, Salvador, BA, 41720-200, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4253-405X
Vinícius Fernandes SarmentoHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Pedro de Toledo St, 1800 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04039-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5987-9440
Matheus ArraesHospital São Luiz Itaim, Dr. Alceu de Campos Rodrigues St, 95, São Paulo, SP, 04544-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3253-0762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive colorectal surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, has enhanced perioperative safety and recovery. However, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction remains frequent, delaying discharge and impairing outcomes. Intravenous lidocaine, owing to its analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, has been proposed to improve recovery, but evidence remains inconsistent, especially after the retraction of a major trial. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on gastrointestinal and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal resections.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was performed through June 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous lidocaine with placebo in adults undergoing laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated with I

resultsTwelve RCTs involving 1208 patients (603 lidocaine, 605 placebo) met inclusion criteria. Lidocaine significantly reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97), shortened time to first bowel movement (MD = - 12.65 h, 95% CI - 21.87 to - 3.43), and decreased time to first flatus (MD = - 7.08 h, 95% CI - 12.85 to - 1.31). Pain scores at 24 h were lower (MD = - 1.61, 95% CI - 2.82 to - 0.41). No significant effects were observed for postoperative ileus (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.69-1.49), hospital stay (MD = - 0.37 days, 95% CI - 0.92 to 0.18), or opioid consumption (MD = 0.47, 95% CI - 10.39 to 11.32). Results remained robust despite moderate-to-high heterogeneity.

conclusionsPerioperative intravenous lidocaine modestly improves gastrointestinal recovery and early postoperative pain after minimally invasive colorectal surgery but does not affect ileus, hospital stay, or opioid use. Routine use should be considered cautiously pending further high-quality trials.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalElective Surgical ProceduresLidocainePain ManagementPostoperative PainColorectal Surgical ProceduresHumansPerioperative CarePostoperative Nausea and VomitingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineColorectal surgeryEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)Gastrointestinal recoveryIntravenous lidocaineMinimally invasive surgeryPostoperative pain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.