ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
First-line treatment patterns and real-world survival outcomes in PD-L1-negative locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the United States.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeContemporary real-world data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (lr/mTNBC) are sparse. We describe first-line (1L) systemic therapies and real-world survival outcomes in this population in the United States (US).
methodsAdults with PD-L1-negative lr/mTNBC initiating 1L systemic treatment in the US were identified using the Komodo Research Data (KRD+; 1/1/2016-12/31/2023). Treatment patterns, including treatment durations and sequences from 1L through three lines of therapy, real-world overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS) from 1L, were analyzed. rwOS and rwPFS were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods in subgroups of patients with ≥ 18 months and ≥ 6 months of potential follow-up, respectively.
resultsOverall, 929 patients were included (median age 59.0 years, 60.1% White, 26.4% Black or African American, 64.9% commercially insured). Most common 1L treatments included cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin-based regimens (28.1%), capecitabine (12.7%), and paclitaxel (10.4%); 44.5% were observed to receive a second-line treatment, and 16.0% a third-line treatment. Treatment sequences were heterogeneous, with 329 unique sequences captured. Median rwOS and rwPFS (95% confidence interval) were 12.2 (10.7, 14.4) months and 4.7 (4.5, 5.2) months, respectively.
conclusionIn this large real-world US cohort of patients with PD-L1-negative lr/mTNBC, 1L treatment regimens were highly heterogeneous and often diverged from guideline recommendations. Despite treatment, survival outcomes remain poor within this patient population. These findings highlight the need for more effective therapeutic options for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.