ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Transforming routine solid tumor profiling with automated next-generation sequencing: experience from a reference general hospital.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing use of targeted therapies highlights the need for integrated DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) to comprehensively profile tumors. A single-center study was conducted to screen tumor types for which a first-line, integrated DNA-RNA NGS strategy provides a valuable advantage for rapid therapeutic decisions. A total of 546 tumor samples, including early- and late-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA/eCCA), and glioblastoma were analyzed using an automated, in-house NGS platform. Sequencing success rates ranged from 98.7% to 100%, with a median turnaround time of eight days from sample collection or histological diagnosis to report delivery. The assay simultaneously detected point mutations, gene fusions, copy number variants, and other clinically relevant alterations, even from small tissue samples. In LUAD, EGFR exon 19 deletions and KRAS p.G12C were the most frequent actionable mutations in early- and late-stage disease, respectively. A significant association was observed between EGFR amplification and the presence of actionable EGFR mutations in late-stage tumors. Actionable co-mutations of EGFR or KRAS with TP53 occurred at distinct frequencies, suggesting relevant clinical implications for therapy selection. Mutation profiles in cholangiocarcinoma and glioblastoma were consistent with published data, reinforcing the robustness of the approach. The results demonstrate that integrated DNA-RNA high-throughput NGS enables timely, precise molecular profiling for personalized therapy in solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.