ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Detrimental effects of atomoxetine on visual signal detection in rats: comparison with ADHD psychomotor stimulant drugs.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with executive dysfunction involving inattention and impulsivity, with evidence of disrupted functional expression of the dopamine and noradrenaline transporters.
objectiveWe investigated the dose-dependent modulation of anti-ADHD drugs on selective and sustained visual attention in low-, mid- and high-attention phenotypes. Two mathematical approaches, signal detection theory and theory of visual attention were applied to further characterise the effects and mechanisms.
methodsRats were trained to detect and respond to the presence or absence of a visual target to obtain food reward on a signal detection task. After attentional performance stabilised, the indirect catecholamine agonist, d-amphetamine (0.1; 0.2; 0.4 mg/kg), the dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor methylphenidate (0.3; 1; 3 mg/kg), and the NA reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine (0.1; 0.3; 1 mg/kg), were administered systemically.
resultsLow-dose d-amphetamine produced baseline-dependent effects on attention, improving target discrimination only in rats with lower attentive performance, whereas methylphenidate did not significantly improve attention but increased guessing. In contrast, low-dose atomoxetine selectively impaired attention in low-attentive subjects, whereas high-dose atomoxetine generally impaired discrimination performance. All three drugs had expected effects on motor response output.
conclusionsAs well as demonstrating baseline-dependent effects of amphetamine on visual attention, the findings for methylphenidate and atomoxetine suggest important, apparently opposing effects on visual signal detection performance produced via blockade of the DA and NA transporters. The deleterious effects of atomoxetine on performance were especially noteworthy in view of its use as a treatment in ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.