SynthesisLung2026
Comparison Between EGFR-TKI Efficacy in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their comparative efficacy and safety profile in early-stage versus advanced-stage disease remains systematically unexplored.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through January 4, 2025. Included studies reported objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Pooled estimates were synthesized using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM).
resultsForty-two studies comprising 46 treatment groups and 3713 patients (343 early-stage; 3370 advanced-stage) were included. EFFICACY: The pooled ORR was significantly higher in advanced-stage NSCLC (0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67) than in early-stage disease (0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.63). In contrast, early-stage disease achieved a higher DCR (0.95 vs. 0.89). SAFETY: Early-stage patients experienced a significantly lower incidence of Grade ≥3 TRAEs compared to those with advanced disease (8.0% vs. 21%).
conclusionEGFR-TKIs provide superior tumor shrinkage (ORR) in advanced NSCLC, the reasons remain uncertain, whereas early-stage disease achieves better disease stability (DCR) with significantly enhanced tolerability. These findings suggest that stage-specific strategies-potentially combining TKIs with other modalities in early stages-are necessary to optimize clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.