ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026
Robotics and Computer Navigation Do Not Offer Notable Benefits Compared with Manual Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer navigation and robotics have been introduced to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve precision in component positioning and soft-tissue balancing. Both technologies have been heavily marketed to both surgeon and patients alike. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis pragmatic, retrospective, single-center study compared outcomes for patients who underwent a primary unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis between January 2020 and December 2023. Surgical technique and implant selection were left to surgeon choice. All TKAs were performed using a medial parapatellar approach, with the majority being cemented. Overall, 4273 patients met eligibility criteria. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected using an electronic patient engagement platform preoperatively and up to 1 year. Linear and logistic regression modeling were used to assess potential confounders.
resultsThe use of computer navigation increased over the time frame assessed, whereas the use of robotics decreased. The majority (87%) of patients underwent a TKA using manual techniques. Noncemented fixation predominated in computer navigation and robotics; demographics reflected a younger, healthier, male patient population. No difference was noted in PROMs or complications among techniques. Costs differed markedly, with the robotic group being an average of $1500 more expensive, even when controlling for confounders.
conclusionsRobotics, but not computer-navigation, increased overall costs of TKA surgery without differences noted in complication rates or PROMs compared with standard instrumentation. This study is notable in that it is pragmatic, and no surgeon involved had industry ties. The best technique for modern TKA remains the one an individual surgeon is most comfortable with.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.