ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2026
Real-World Outcomes of Automated Insulin Delivery Use in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomated insulin delivery (AID) systems are increasingly used by individuals living with diabetes in the outpatient setting, but data on their safety and effectiveness during hospitalizations remains limited. The objective is to evaluate the use and efficiency of AID systems in hospitalized adults with diabetes.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study based on electronic health record data from hospital admissions of 316 patients with diabetes using insulin pumps. Automated insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitor use, insulin pump continuation, length of stay (LOS), and glycemic outcomes among the cohort were analyzed. The primary aims of the study were to describe rates of insulin pump continuation and reasons associated with removal, and rates of pump reinitiation. Secondary outcomes included effects of insulin pump removal and prompt endocrinology consultation on inpatient glycemic outcomes and LOS.
resultsInsulin pumps were continued in 64.2% of all admissions. The most common reason for pump discontinuation was surgery (30.1%). Length of stay was longer when pumps were removed (8.3 vs 4.7 days,
conclusionsContinuation of insulin pumps was associated with improvement in hyperglycemia without increased hypoglycemia risk and with shorter LOS in the hospital. Standardized institutional policies including prompt glycemic management team consultation may help expand safe continuation of AID during hospitalizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.