ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
The role of social behaviour in providing resilience to environmental change.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal populations are exposed to environmental variation through yearly and seasonal fluctuations, as well as human-induced rapid environmental change. Social behaviour has received growing attention as a potentially important but underappreciated mechanism for resilience to environmental changes. Social interactions shape access to resources, information, protection from predators and opportunities for reproduction. They can also influence how individuals experience and respond to environmental stressors, which relates to the concept of social buffering, a pattern where sociality attenuates the detrimental effects of stressors on individual and population fitness. Such ideas have typically been examined using biogeographic analyses to test whether social living is more prevalent in harsh environments. However, there may also be variation in social behaviour within populations and within an individual's lifespan that serves to maintain or even enhance fitness during environmental changes. In this Special Feature, we present a collection of contributions examining the role of social interactions in maintaining fitness in the face of adverse effects across mammal, reptile and insect species. These studies were conducted under laboratory and field conditions and in response to a wide range of ecological factors, including predation risk, food abundance and interspecific competition. Collectively, we see that social behaviour interacts with environmental variation through multiple pathways, and these behavioural adjustments can have consequences for individual fitness and scale up to affect population performance. Lastly, we offer suggestions for future research directions to address remaining knowledge gaps and advance our understanding of the links between environmental variation, social behaviour, fitness outcomes and population persistence. Such work has the potential to provide valuable insights for management and conservation efforts, which is critically important in a rapidly changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.