Synonymous mutations in essential genes infrequently produce fitness effects in human cell lines.

The assumption that synonymous mutations are fitness-neutral is central to many foundational results in the fields of genetics, genomics, evolutionary biology, and medicine. However, recent results suggest synonymous mutations have pervasive and strong fitness effects. These vigorously debated studies in non-human model systems have even suggested that the proportion of synonymous mutations and their fitness effect sizes are similar to non-synonymous mutations. To probe the fitness effect of synonymous mutations, we utilized recent advances in base editing to test 8558 potential synonymous mutations in 128 highly essential genes in human cell lines. Importantly, our library design excluded splice-proximal sites, ensuring a direct test of codon-level synonymous effects independent of splicing disruption. We find that synonymous mutations rarely have fitness effects on growth, occurring around 37.9-fold (95% CI: 22.16-81.48-fold) less frequently than missense mutations. In this experimental context, these findings demonstrate that synonymous mutations impact cellular fitness far less frequently than missense mutations. These results deviate from earlier reports of widespread synonymous fitness effects in yeast, yet they align with recent prime editing data observed in other human cell lines.