ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Electrodiagnostic and Clinical Outcomes after Supercharged Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer in Advanced Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In patients with advanced cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), conventional surgical outcomes are often suboptimal due to the long distance required for nerve regeneration. The supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar motor nerve transfer (referred to as SETS transfer) has been proposed to enhance reinnervation and accelerate recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the electrodiagnostic and clinical outcomes of SETS transfer in patients with advanced CuTS and to determine the time course of functional recovery. Methods: This prospective study included 11 patients with severe, non-traumatic CuTS (modified McGowan grade IIB or III) who underwent ulnar nerve decompression, subcutaneous anterior transposition, and SETS transfer. Electrodiagnostic studies were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, assessing compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseous muscles, sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the ulnar and dorsal ulnar cutaneous (DUC) nerves, and detection of nascent motor unit action potentials (MUAPs). Grip and key-pinch strength and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months. Results: The CMAP amplitude of the ADM significantly improved at the 12-month follow-up compared to the preoperative assessment ( Conclusions: SETS transfer may promote early reinnervation and improve intrinsic muscle function in patients with severe CuTS. Serial electrodiagnostic studies suggest that SETS transfer may contribute to motor recovery within the first 6 months postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.