ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
A 7-Year Review of Urological Injuries arising from Obstetric and Gynaecological Surgeries in Abuja, Nigeria.
Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collateral injuries to the urinary tract during obstetric and gynaecological (O&G) surgeries are not uncommon. Delay in recognition of such mishaps may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to document the incidence, clinical presentations, aetiology, types and management of urologic injuries arising from O&G surgeries. Methodology: Retrospective review of electronic medical records of all patients with urologic injuries arising from O&G surgeries managed by the urology unit of Federal Medical Centre, Abuja, from January 2019 to December 2025. The extracted data included biodata, clinical presentation, initial O&G diagnoses, types of injuries, timing of injury recognition, and reconstructive surgeries performed, as well as outcomes. These were analysed using SPSS 27.0. Results: There were 19 patients (0.26%) with urologic injuries out of 7,312 O&G surgeries performed within the study period. The mean age of the patients was 39.4 ± 9.6, with ages ranging from 27 to 64 years. Total abdominal hysterectomy was the leading offending surgery (n=10, 52.6%). The commonest initial diagnosis was uterine leiomyoma (n=8, 42.1%). Bladder injury (n=10, 52.6%) was more common than the ureteric injury (n=9,47.4%) in our study. Most of the injuries were recognized intra-operatively (57.9%). We did not record any mortality. Conclusion: Urologic injuries during obstetric and gynecological surgeries, though rare, can lead to significant morbidity. Our study found that total abdominal hysterectomy is the most common procedure associated with these injuries, primarily bladder injuries, most of which were detected during surgery. This underscores the necessity for increased surgeon awareness to prevent complications. Despite the low incidence and no mortality in our cohort, ongoing monitoring and the use of improved surgical techniques are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42553961PMC13436993What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.