Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553952›Full record

ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology

Central Depression among Pretreatment Endoscopic Features is Associated with Submucosal Invasion in Gastric Fundic Gland-Type Tumors.

Junnosuke Hayasaka, Ochiai Yotinari, Yusuke Kawai, Yutaka Takazawa, Shu Hoteya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junnosuke HayasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ochiai YotinariDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka TakazawaDepartment of Pathology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shu HoteyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fundic gland-type neoplasms show a relatively high frequency of submucosal (SM) invasion despite their small size and low-grade biological behavior. Reliable pretreatment endoscopic predictors of SM invasion, however, remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between pretreatment endoscopic features and SM invasion, focusing on central depression. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included fundic gland-type neoplasms treated by endoscopic SM dissection between January 2010 and August 2024. Only pretreatment endoscopic images obtained before biopsy were evaluated and reassessed by multiple blinded endoscopists. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using lesion size (≥5 mm vs. <5 mm), central depression, and reddish coloration, with age categorized by the median as a confounder. Sensitivity analyses and an exploratory simple score analysis were conducted. Results: A total of 114 lesions were analyzed, including 70 intramucosal and 44 SM-invasive lesions. Central depression was independently associated with SM invasion (odds ratio, 5.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-31.94; Conclusion: Central depression is an important pretreatment endoscopic feature independently associated with SM invasion in fundic gland-type neoplasms. Careful assessment of pretreatment endoscopic findings may aid SM invasion risk stratification and support treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Central depressionFundic gland-type neoplasmSubmucosal invasion

Identifiers

PMID42553952
PMCPMC13436938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.