ArticleSurgical case reports2026
A Case of Retained Viable Appendiceal Segment after Perforated Appendicitis.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConservative management of perforated appendicitis is widely accepted; however, residual appendiceal tissue may persist and lead to delayed complications. We report a rare case of a retained viable appendiceal segment identified during interval appendectomy (IA). CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old patient was treated conservatively for perforated appendicitis without abscess formation but with marked periappendiceal inflammatory changes. Two months after the initial treatment, an IA was planned. Follow-up CT demonstrated enlargement of the appendix compared with the initial imaging. Intraoperatively, the appendix was found to be transected at the mid-portion. The distal segment was separated from the proximal stump and encapsulated by the omentum and small intestine with dense adhesions. This distal segment remained viable because it retained blood supply through the mesoappendix and showed inflammatory enlargement. Histopathological examination demonstrated preserved appendiceal wall structure with inflammatory cell infiltration, without evidence of necrosis or malignancy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on POD 3.
conclusionsA retained viable appendiceal segment may persist and enlarge after perforated appendicitis treated conservatively, potentially leading to delayed complications such as secondary perforation or abscess formation; therefore, surgeons should be aware of this possibility and consider IA in selected patients. Careful attention should be paid to ensure complete removal of the appendix, including any detached distal segments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.