Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553844›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Optic nerve sheath diameter as a prognostic tool for postdural puncture headache in pregnant women undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A cross-sectional study.

N Amulya, Lavanya Kaparti, Suresh N Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N AmulyaAssistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India.
Lavanya KapartiProfessor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India.
Suresh N KumarProfessor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common and debilitating complication following spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients, with few objective tools available for early prediction. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasonography is a noninvasive surrogate marker of intracranial pressure changes and may aid in early risk stratification. Aim: To evaluate the prognostic utility of ONSD measurements in predicting PDPH among pregnant women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 88 pregnant women aged between 18 and 40 years undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. ONSD was measured using ultrasonography with a 13-6 MHz probe at baseline (T0) and at 4 (T4), 24 (T24), 48 (T48), and 72 h (T72) postprocedure. PDPH was diagnosed using International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Student's Results: PDPH occurred in 12 patients (13.6%). Baseline ONSD values were comparable between groups. Patients who developed PDPH showed significantly lower ONSD values from T4 onward ( Conclusion: ONSD measurement at 72 h postspinal anesthesia is a sensitive and clinically useful prognostic tool for predicting PDPH in obstetric patients and may be incorporated into routine postoperative monitoring.

Indexed as

anesthesiacesarean sectionintracranial pressureobstetric anesthesiaOptic nervepost-dural puncture headachepregnancyspinalUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42553844
PMCPMC13436898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.