ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Large language model-based simulated patient training for heart failure palliative care communication: a pilot study.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Heart failure (HF) palliative care communication is essential but difficult to train at scale because conventional role-play programmes require facilitators and standardized patients. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as potential tools for scalable communication training. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a web-based LLM-driven communication training application and to explore its early educational signal on physicians' self-efficacy. Methods and results: This single-arm pilot study included physicians who completed one session using a Japanese-language web-based LLM application designed to simulate patients with advanced HF and provide automated framework-based feedback. The primary outcome was change in self-efficacy scores assessed by pre- and post-session questionnaires. Ten sessions were analysed. Physicians engaged in a mean of 7.6 ± 2.0 dialogue turns. Mean response time per model output and feedback generation were approximately 3 and 17 s, respectively. Significant improvements were observed in knowledge of palliative care communication (mean difference +1.7, adjusted Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a web-based LLM-simulated patient system and suggested an early educational signal in physicians' self-efficacy for HF palliative care communication. Our scalable LLM-driven communication training may complement traditional educational approaches with further evaluation in larger controlled studies. Clinical trial registration: Trial registration number: UMIN000059988.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.