ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Navigator readouts with optimized processing improve spinal cord and gray matter segmentability in multi-echo gradient-echo imaging.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-echo gradient-echo (ME-GRE) acquisitions of the spinal cord (SC) are highly susceptible to breathing-induced magnetic field fluctuations arising from the proximity of the lungs, often resulting in ghosting artifacts and signal loss. A navigator readout can be employed to monitor and correct for these field variations; however, conventional navigator processing methods frequently fail in the SC due to its small size and distinct anatomy. Here, we evaluate the impact of a recently introduced, SC-specific navigator processing approach on SC and gray matter (GM) segmentability. ME-GRE images were acquired at 3T during free breathing in ten healthy volunteers, covering the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spinal cord. Data were collected both with and without a centerline navigator readout. Acquisitions without navigators included five imaging echoes, whereas those with navigators comprised four imaging echoes followed by an additional readout of the k-space centerline (the "navigator echo"). The navigator readout was processed using a recently introduced method optimized for the SC. The effect of the optimized navigator correction was evaluated by contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), qualitative ratings of SC and GM segmentability, and the performance of automatic segmentation algorithms. Compared with acquisitions without navigators, optimized navigator correction significantly improved quantitative image quality metrics, particularly GM-white matter CNR at the C7-T1 and T7-T8 vertebral levels and across the lumbosacral cord. Regarding SC and GM segmentability, raters preferred images with navigators over uncorrected images at nearly all spinal cord levels, with the strongest effect observed for GM segmentability in the lumbosacral cord. Although overall automatic segmentation performance was comparable between acquisition types, automatic GM segmentation failed at the lumbosacral cord in the presence of severe artifacts in acquisitions without navigators, while remaining robust in the corresponding navigator-corrected images. In conclusion, navigator processing optimized for SC imaging improves image quality and segmentability in ME-GRE acquisitions, making this technique attractive for both clinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.