ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Mitigating artificial light at night: effectiveness of policies and implications for plant phenology.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light pollution, an increasingly recognized environmental hazard, disrupts urban ecosystems, including plant phenology, such as leaf-out and senescence. In recent years, municipalities have enacted legislation to reduce artificial light at night (ALAN) at city levels. However, the effectiveness of these mitigation strategies on reducing ALAN and their impacts on urban ecosystems remain underexplored. Here, we present a proof of concept analysis to explore the potential of ALAN-mitigation policies on changes in intensity and spectrum composition of ALAN and consequent changes in plant phenology using Sustainable Development Science Satellite 1 data for 2022-2024 in paired US cities-one with mitigation policies and one without. Results suggest that ALAN declined in cities with ALAN-mitigation policies (New York City and Washington DC), with the largest decline in blue band. In contrast, ALAN increased in cities without policies (Newark and Philadelphia). The reduction in shifts of spring and autumn phenology observed in cities with mitigation was consistent with declines in ALAN exposure. These findings highlight the potential of multispectral nighttime light data in quantitatively assessing the efficacy of ALAN-mitigation policies in reducing light pollution and its ecological impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.