ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026
Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Strongly Correlate With Pain and Physical Function Metrics but not Mental Health Before and After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the relationships between hip-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) metrics and general health and pain measures before and after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS at a single institution from 2014 to 2025. PRO scores, including hip-specific scores of modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), as well as general health scores including 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) physical and mental components and visual analog scale pain, were collected. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between hip-specific outcome scores and quality of life metrics across multiple pre- and postoperative time points. Results: Six hundred sixty-eight patients (53.9% female) average age 34.3 years, body mass index 24.6, and mean follow-up 20.1 ± 14.0 months (range 3-60) were included. Both hip-specific PRO tools (HOOS and mHHS) showed at least strong-moderate, but mostly strong, correlations with both the visual analog scale pain scale and SF-12 physical component score preoperatively and at all time points postoperatively (Spearman's Conclusions: Hip-specific PRO scores have significant, strong correlations with both pain and physical function metrics before and after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. However, there was little to no correlation between hip-specific PROs and mental health metrics in this cohort. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.