ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Transvaginal single-pathway composite reconstruction for pelvic organ prolapse combined with rectal prolapse: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse (RP) is a relatively rare and often underrecognized clinical condition, typically managed as two separate entities within a single-disciplinary framework. Historically, transvaginal mesh (TVM), although widely used in pelvic floor reconstruction, has not been applied to treat RP. We report a 76-year-old female with severe POP and concomitant RP. Guided by the integral theory of pelvic floor, we innovatively cut and assembled TiLOOP Total 4 mesh into Total 6 configuration, connected it to a trimmed TiLOOP mesh (10 × 15 cm), and performed transvaginal fixation of the anterior rectal wall using the mesh during TVM pelvic floor reconstruction. This modified TVM pelvic floor reconstruction with concurrent TVM rectopexy achieved unexpectedly favorable outcomes, with no recurrence or mesh-related complications at 18 months of follow-up.Our findings suggest that, in selected cases meeting the indications, combined TVM pelvic floor reconstruction with concurrent TVM rectopexy appears to be feasible and may represent a potential effective treatment option for colorectal and gynecologic surgeons managing concurrent POP and RP. It should be noted, however, that this is a single case report with limited sample size, no control group, and short-term follow-up. Future studies with cohort designs or extended follow-up are warranted to further validate the efficacy of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.