Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553518›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Metabolomic Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Utility.

Rabeea Rizwan, Aliu Olalekan Olatunji, Avrina Kartika Ririe, Sravani Pamidi, Khaja Farazuddin, Haroon Abdullah, Tooba Iram, Faisal Saeed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rabeea RizwanHealth and Social Care, Scholars School System, Birmingham, GBR.
Aliu Olalekan OlatunjiMedical Microbiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, NGA.
Avrina Kartika RiriePathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angles, USA.
Sravani PamidiMedicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, CHN.
Khaja FarazuddinInternal Medicine, RajaRajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Haroon AbdullahCardiac Critical Care, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND.
Tooba IramCardiac Critical Care, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND.
Faisal SaeedGeneral Practice, Capital Hospital, Islamabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases continue to pose a substantial global health burden, and their timely diagnosis remains challenging because traditional diagnostic methods are frequently time-consuming and have limited sensitivity for early disease detection. A new high-throughput analytical technique, metabolomics, can be used to identify small-molecule biomarkers of real-time physiological response to infection. The objective of the present study was to critically analyze the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the metabolomics biomarkers in the early detection of infectious diseases. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Extensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library of studies published between January 2014 and December 2025. Studies that evaluated metabolomics biomarkers to diagnose and report infectious diseases were included in the analyses to measure quantitative results, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Quality was assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Diagnostic estimates were pooled via a random-effects model, and the Cochran's Q and I² tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Subgroup, sensitivity, and the publication bias analyses were also carried out. A total of 22 studies with 3,842 participants were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated high diagnostic performance of metabolomics biomarkers, with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88), specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), and an overall AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). Subgroup analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of bacterial infections (AUC = 0.90) was the best, then viral and parasitic infections. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) demonstrated a high level of performance (AUC = 0.91) in comparison to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). There was moderate heterogeneity (I² > 50%), and no publication bias was found. The findings were robust, as confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Metabolomics biomarkers demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and significant potential for the early detection of infectious diseases, although definitions of early-stage infection varied across the included studies. These findings support the integration of metabolomics into diagnostic pathways to facilitate timely diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. Further methodological standardization and large-scale validation studies are required to support clinical implementation.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnostic accuracyearly detectioninfectious diseasesmeta-analysismetabolomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42553518
PMCPMC13435216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.