ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)
Unpacking the Protective Power of Social Support in Mitigating Prenatal Anxiety Among Low-Resourced Populations: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Anxiety during pregnancy is a prevalent but underemphasized mental health concern with downstream impacts on the entire family unit. Quality social support is strongly related to mental well-being and provides a promising strategy to prevent and manage prenatal anxiety. Methods: This convergent mixed-methods study used a cross-sectional survey and interviews to: (1) Quantitatively investigate what adverse social determinants of health and multi-level sources of social support are most predictive of prenatal anxiety and (2) Qualitatively examine different types of social support that may buffer prenatal anxiety among a sample of pregnant women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Results: Hierarchical linear regressions revealed that race and food insecurity were predictive of prenatal anxiety and that social support from friends/peers was most protective against prenatal anxiety. Integration of quantitative survey data and qualitative interview data suggested that emotional support was most protective among this sample of pregnant women. Discussion: The results of this study highlight opportunities for adaptations of prenatal peer support programs to include a focus on mitigating food insecurity and promoting emotional support from peers in order to most effectively buffer prenatal anxiety among underresourced pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.