ArticleHealth science reports2026
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Needle Stick Injury Among Health Care Workers in Mogadishu Somalia.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Needlestick injuries (NSIs) remain a major occupational hazard among healthcare workers (HCWs), increasing the risk of exposure to blood-borne infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although largely preventable, NSIs continue to occur frequently in fragile and resource-limited health systems, including Somalia. This study assessed healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding NSIs in Mogadishu, Somalia, to identify existing gaps and inform occupational safety interventions. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Mogadishu, Somalia, from July 2024 to January 2025. A total of 422 healthcare workers from public and private health facilities were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected through a validated self-administered electronic questionnaire covering sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to NSIs. Scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice were categorized using Bloom's cut-off criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression in SPSS version 20, with statistical significance set at Results: Overall, 82.94% of participants demonstrated good knowledge of needlestick injuries (NSIs), with a mean score of 8.15 ± 2.23. However, gaps remained in awareness of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and the recommended timing of follow-up viral testing. Attitudes toward NSI prevention were generally positive, with 96.21% of participants classified as having a positive attitude. Nevertheless, some respondents continued to prioritize patient care over healthcare worker safety. Preventive practices were less satisfactory, with only 44.79% of participants reporting good practice. Underreporting of injuries and delayed uptake of PEP were also notable concerns. In the adjusted analysis, healthcare workers aged 18-30 years were less likely to report good preventive practices than those aged over 40 years (AOR = 0.30, Conclusion: Despite relatively high knowledge and generally positive attitudes toward NSI prevention, important gaps in preventive practice remain among healthcare workers in Mogadishu. Underreporting of injuries and inadequate post-exposure management highlight a persistent gap between awareness and action. Targeted interventions aimed at younger healthcare workers, improved reporting systems, better access to PEP, and stronger institutional safety practices are needed to reduce the burden of NSIs in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.