ArticleHealth science reports2026
Predicting Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Models Among Patients at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major global health burden, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where access to neurocritical care is limited. Accurate and context-appropriate prognostic models are crucial to guide early clinical decision-making and optimize resource allocation in such settings. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models for predicting TBI outcomes among adult patients using trauma registry data from Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Tanzania. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from 4596 adult TBI patients recorded in the KCMC trauma registry between 2013 and 2024. The outcome was dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS): poor (1-3) versus good (4-5). Ten supervised ML algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), were trained on 70% of the data after applying multiple imputation and synthetic minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address missingness and class imbalance. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed on a 30% test set using area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Results: Among the 4596 patients, 26.2% had poor outcomes. The RF and DT models achieved the highest AUCs of 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. RF also showed the highest accuracy (0.78) and strong positive predictive value (PPV = 0.87), while DT had the highest sensitivity for poor outcomes (84.5%). Predictors of poor outcomes included TBI severity, pupil non-reactivity, low oxygen saturation, lack of CT scan, alcohol use, and abnormal vital signs. Conclusion: ML models, particularly RF and DT, demonstrated strong predictive performance for TBI outcomes using routinely collected variables in a resource-limited LMIC setting. Their interpretability and reliance on admission-level data make them potential tools for real-time triage and risk stratification. Future research should focus on external validation and integration into clinical decision-support systems to support scaleup across similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.