ArticleAEM education and training2026
Improving Faculty Performance in Providing Written Feedback to Learners.
Article in AEM education and training, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Faculty Performance in Providing Written Feedback to Learners.AEM education and training · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Faculty acknowledged the importance of completing resident and student assessments yet demonstrated difficulty in consistently performing this task. The investigators aimed to increase the completion of written assessments by faculty in an academic medical center between the years of 2019 and 2024, with success defined as assessments of 100% of medical student shifts and 50% of resident shifts in the emergency department. Methods: To meet the objective, the investigators established faculty assessment targets in 2020 and implemented annual interventions over 4 years, including incorporation into annual faculty evaluations, use of a tracking dashboard, and integration into the compensation plan. Performance was retrospectively analyzed for the year prior to and the 4 years of interventions. Results: Faculty completed assessments for 70% of student shifts and 28% of resident shifts in the 2019-20 academic year. Completion rates improved incrementally over the 4 years of successive interventions and reached 99% of student shifts assessed and 76% of resident shifts assessed. Secondarily, the proportion of faculty meeting assessment targets increased over the study period, with 100% completion rising from 16% to 56% and ≥ 50% completion rising from 34% to 81%. Conclusions: Faculty assessment completion improved substantially after implementation of targets, dashboards, and compensation incentives. These interventions increased both the proportion of learner shifts assessed and the percentage of faculty meeting assessment targets, demonstrating a sustainable strategy to enhance feedback practices in academic medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.