ArticleCureus2026
Single-Center Pilot Evaluation of Virtual Vascular Surgery Rotation in Retention of Knowledge and Skills.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic substantially disrupted surgical education, primarily by limiting in-person rotations, prompting the development of virtual learning platforms. The University of California Davis Vascular Surgery Department piloted a two-week virtual vascular surgery rotation to evaluate its effectiveness in improving surgical skills and knowledge retention among fourth-year medical students nationwide.
methodsFive medical students from across the United States enrolled and participated in the virtual rotation. Baseline assessments were obtained, including a 37-question multiple-choice examination covering core vascular topics and timed evaluations of one-handed and two-handed knot-tying skills. The virtual curriculum included interactive sessions, such as case conferences, virtual rounding, faculty- and resident-led didactics, and journal clubs, as well as non-interactive components (readings, recorded surgical videos, and written assignments). Students were reassessed post-rotation and at six months. Statistical analysis was performed using mean comparisons and Fisher's exact testing, with significance set at p<0.05.
resultsStudents demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both one-handed and two-handed knot-tying skills at the two-week and six-month time points compared to baseline (p<0.05). Knowledge scores improved at two weeks (p=0.012) but declined by six months; there was no significant difference from baseline (p=0.32). All students remained above baseline in both skills and knowledge at six months despite measurable regression from the two-week assessment. Interactive sessions were rated more favorably than non-interactive activities (p=0.003). All participants reported that the rotation met expectations.
conclusionsVirtual education has become an integral part of modern education, including the surgical realm. A virtual surgical rotation can produce sustained progress and improvement in surgical skills and knowledge base. While knowledge retention may decline over time with the virtual format alone, this only reinforces the need for multimodal education elements and long-term learning that may incorporate reading and continued clinical/surgical exposure. Interactive components appear to be critical to the perceived educational value of virtual surgical rotations as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.