ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Bond strength of different viscosities Giomer-based composites to dentin under erosive conditions.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of Giomer-based restorative composites with different viscosities bonded to dentin under various erosive conditions. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty dentin specimens from human sound molars were selected and divided into three groups according to the erosive challenge: ERO (initial erosion with citric acid 0.3%, pH 2.6, 5 min, 5x/day, 1 day), CYC (ERO protocol, followed by an additional 5-day erosive cycling challenge after restoration), and CON (sound dentin, without erosion, control). Specimens were further subdivided into four groups ( Results: Significant differences were observed for the eroded substrate ( Conclusion: Erosive cycling decreased the bond strength for all composites tested, irrespective of their viscosity. Regarding the flowable composites, the bulk fill one presented a higher value than the conventional non-bulk fill, while this difference was not observed for the regular-viscosity composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.