Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553354›Full record

ArticleMotivation and emotion2026

The road not taken: selective sampling and persisting inaccurate impressions.

Emily Ann Vanlooy, Chris Harris, Irene van de Vijver, Ruud Custers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Motivation and emotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily Ann VanlooyUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-0895-3879
Chris HarrisUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Irene van de VijverUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruud CustersUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When individuals learn through experience, they tend to choose those options they believe will produce the most favourable outcomes. Research by Harris et al. (J Exp Psychol: General 149(10):1855-1877, 2020) indicated that this inclination to consistently engage with the perceived optimal choice can bias the resulting evidence, potentially perpetuating inaccurate beliefs under certain conditions. It remains unclear, however, whether this bias persistence depends on the valence of the learning context. In the present study, participants completed a two-armed bandit task with identical options, where initial evidence was manipulated to induce the belief that one option was better than the other. Experiment 1 was conducted in a rewarding context, where financial gains served as a reinforcer (as opposed to neutral outcomes), while Experiment 2 featured a negative context, with the omission of an expected aversive event as a reinforcer. Behavioral measures showed signs of a lasting bias in the aversive context of Experiment 2, corroborated by a bias in explicit contingency estimates. No such effects were observed in the positive context of Experiment 1. These findings suggest that outcome valence modulates bias persistence in experiential learning. Implications for how negative contexts may promote the maintenance of irrational aversive beliefs are discussed.

Indexed as

Exploration–exploitation trade-offImpression formationRewarding and aversive outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42553354
PMCPMC13433704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.