ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
HSCT and CAR-T: a power couple-but who serves whom?
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy are two major therapeutic approaches for hematologic malignancies. HSCT can provide durable disease control through conditioning-induced tumor cytoreduction, immune reconstitution, and graft-versus-leukemia effects, whereas CAR-T therapy provides antigen-specific antitumor activity and has reshaped the treatment landscape for relapsed or refractory leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (MM). Despite these advances, both therapeutic approaches continue to face multiple challenges. HSCT is limited by disease relapse and transplant-related complications, while CAR-T therapy is challenged by antigen escape, limited persistence, and treatment-related toxicities. Increasing clinical experience suggests that HSCT and CAR-T therapy should not be viewed as competing strategies, but rather as complementary therapeutic approaches whose value depends on disease characteristics, depth of response, immune recovery, and transplant feasibility. On the one hand, CAR-T therapy can reduce tumor burden before transplantation, be incorporated into modified conditioning regimens, or be used after allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) as prophylactic, preemptive, or salvage cellular therapy. On the other hand, HSCT can consolidate CAR-T-induced remission, provide hematopoietic support in selected settings, and create a post-transplant immune environment that may facilitate subsequent CAR-T-cell therapy. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for HSCT-CAR-T integration in leukemia, lymphoma, and MM. We discuss major integration strategies, including HSCT after CAR-T therapy, CAR-T-assisted conditioning, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)-CAR-T sequential strategies, and CAR-T therapy after allo-HSCT. We aim to help match appropriate patients to the most suitable HSCT-CAR-T strategies and thereby improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.