ArticleAEM education and training2026
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Faculty Scholarship Program for Emergency Medicine Clinician Educators.
Article in AEM education and training, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Faculty Scholarship Program for Emergency Medicine Clinician Educators.AEM education and training · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scholarship is essential for career progression within academic settings. Unfortunately, time pressures, uncertain processes, and unclear or absent resources remain barriers. We describe the development, implementation, and effectiveness of an internally funded scholarship program for EM faculty clinician educators led by the effort from 2 faculty physician scientists and a full-time Health Science Research Analyst. Methods: The program was developed through a needs assessment survey, discussions with faculty development leadership, and components of the PRISM implementation framework. Effectiveness was assessed using an interrupted time series (1 year pre- and 1 year post-implementation). Scholarship was defined a priori as manuscripts, abstract acceptances, regional/national presentations, book chapters, and online publications. The target audience was faculty, residents, fellows, attendings, and advanced practice providers. Results: Our needs assessment survey suggested deficiencies in mentorship, formal curriculum, academic writing, and navigating journal submissions. A conceptual framework for scholarship was developed with 4 domains: education, clinical trials and studies, administrative, and training. The program was implemented July 1, 2024, and adopted by 17% ( Conclusion: A faculty scholarship program for EM clinician educators was successfully executed within an implementation science framework. Our program was well received by end users and displayed an increase in scholarly output. Future evaluations will focus on program sustainability, growth, and impact on promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.