SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Impact of cryopreservation on PBMC-derived CAR-T cell manufacturing outcomes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an established treatment for several hematological malignancies, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) serving as the starting material for manufacturing. Cryopreservation of PBMCs may offer logistical flexibility, although its influence on manufacturing outcomes remains incompletely defined. This review aimed to compare the effect of fresh versus cryopreserved PBMC starting material on CAR-T cell manufacturing outcomes, including viability, fold expansion, and transduction efficiency. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from inception through March 2026 for original studies comparing fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs in human CAR-T cell manufacturing. Methodological quality was assessed using the design-appropriate quality-appraisal tools, and findings were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study design and protocols. Results: Five studies published between 2019 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria, comprising two clinical and three experimental analyses. Post-thaw viability and recovery of cryopreserved PBMCs ranged between 77% and 97%, slightly lower than fresh material. Fold expansion, transduction efficiency, and cytotoxic activity were generally comparable between groups, although some studies reported transient early differences including prolonged doubling times, mitochondrial dysfunction signals, and increased TIM-3 expression in cryopreserved-derived products. Conclusion: Cryopreservation can be considered a feasible approach in CAR-T manufacturing, with generally comparable outcomes despite early post-thaw cellular changes. These differences do not seem to consistently compromise the overall manufacturing performance. However, the current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, and further studies are required to increase confidence in our initial findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.