SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Prognostic significance of tumoral Siglec-15 expression in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Siglec-15 has emerged as a novel immune checkpoint molecule and a potential therapeutic target in solid tumors. Previous studies reported inconsistent prognostic significance of tumoral Siglec-15 expression across cancer types. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the association of tumoral Siglec-15 expression with survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically searched from database inception to March 30, 2026. Observational studies investigating Siglec-15 protein expression in tumor cells and prognosis were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Prespecified subgroup analyses, meta-regression analyses, and publication bias assessment were performed. Results: Twenty-seven datasets involving 4075 patients were included. High tumoral Siglec-15 expression was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS, HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.25-1.86, Conclusions: Elevated tumoral Siglec-15 expression was associated with unfavorable OS and DFS/RFS, whereas the borderline association with improved DSS should be interpreted cautiously because it was based on only three studies. These findings support a highly cancer-type dependent role of Siglec-15 as a clinically relevant prognostic biomarker and a promising immunotherapeutic target. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and develop standardized assessment strategies, preferably using fixed cutoff values and simplified scoring methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.