ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Prescribed medicines among pregnant women attending health facilities in Eritrea: patterns, safety, and determinants.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prescribing unsafe medications during pregnancy poses significant risks for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This nationwide study assessed medication utilization patterns, safety risk classifications, and associated determinants among pregnant women in Eritrea. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 32 health facilities across Eritrea from October to December 2024. Data were collected through patient interviews, prescription reviews, and medical record abstractions. Medication safety was evaluated by translating Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) narrative summaries into three clinical tiers (safe, cautious, and contraindicated) and comparing them with the legacy United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) pregnancy risk categories. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 26.0 to identify factors associated with exposure to potentially unsafe medications. Results: A total of 740 pregnant women were included, with a mean (SD) age of 26.95 (5.75) years. A total of 1,031 medicines were prescribed, with a mean of 1.39 (SD = 0.65) medications per prescription. According to the legacy US-FDA system, the prevalence of prescriptions containing potentially risky medicines (Categories C and D) was 4.2% (95% CI: 3.0, 5.9). Under the PLLR framework, 96.7% of the medications were classified as "safe," 2.4% as "cautious," and 0.9% as "contraindicated." The most common "Cautious" medications were metronidazole (n = 10) and nitrofurantoin (n = 3), while "Contraindicated" agents primarily included diclofenac (n = 5) and ciprofloxacin (n = 2). While the agreement between the two systems was high (96.7%), the Cohen's kappa (kappa = 0.486) indicated moderate concordance. Type of healthcare facility (AOR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.11, 5.12), presence of chronic illness (AOR = 12.56; 95% CI: 3.52, 44.88), and first-trimester gestational age (AOR = 3.39; 95% CI: 1.28, 8.99) were significantly associated with exposure to potentially unsafe medicines under the legacy system, while urban residence (AOR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.23, 6.49) was a significant determinant under the PLLR framework. Conclusion: Prescribing practices during pregnancy were largely characterized by low polypharmacy and a predominant reliance on medications classified as lower-risk under both frameworks. However, the transition to the PLLR framework provides a more precise risk assessment, addressing the ambiguity of legacy categories. Targeted interventions are needed for high-risk groups, particularly women with chronic illnesses, those in early pregnancy, and urban residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.