ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Biomechanical and clinical analysis of pelvic stability and the role of internal fixation after debridement for sacroiliac joint tuberculosis with different degrees of bone destruction.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the biomechanical characteristics and clinical outcomes after lesion debridement at varying degrees of sacroiliac joint destruction, and to assess the role of internal fixation in postoperative stability. Materials and Methods: Finite element analysis: An intact three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvis was established based on CT data from a healthy adult. On this basis, unilateral sacroiliac joint articular surface destruction of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% was simulated. For each destruction level, two postoperative models were constructed: debridement alone and debridement combined with internal fixation. Under physiological standing load conditions, pelvic global displacement, relative displacement of the sacroiliac joint surface, and displacement and stress distributions of the sacrum and ilium were comparatively analyzed among different models. Clinical analysis: A retrospective analysis was performed on 20 patients with sacroiliac joint tuberculosis who underwent lesion debridement at our institution between January 2010 and December 2025. Based on preoperative imaging, all patients had mild sacroiliac joint destruction (<1/3 involvement). The patients were divided into a debridement-alone group (n = 10) and debridement combined with internal fixation group (n = 10). Perioperative variables, including operative time, blood loss, and inflammatory markers, were systematically compared between the two groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by dynamically assessing changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and Majeed functional scores. Results: Finite element analysis demonstrated that, in the debridement-alone model, overall pelvic displacement, relative displacement across the sacroiliac joint, as well as local bone displacement and stress values increased progressively with the severity of sacroiliac joint destruction. Under mild destruction, changes in these biomechanical parameters were minimal and showed no significant differences compared with the intact model ( Conclusion: This study provides an initial biomechanical arithmetic modeling framework and compares its outputs with relevant clinical findings. The degree of sacroiliac joint destruction is closely associated with postoperative pelvic stability. In cases of mild destruction, debridement alone yields satisfactory outcomes, with no additional benefit observed from adjunctive internal fixation. As the severity of destruction increases, pelvic stability progressively declines, and the stabilizing effect of internal fixation becomes increasingly evident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.