ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Finite element analysis of the effects of different ossification types and spinal canal occupancy rates on dynamic spinal cord stress in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of ossification type and spinal canal occupancy rate on dynamic spinal cord stress in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL) using finite element analysis. Methods: A validated C2-C7 finite element model was constructed from CT and MRI data of a healthy volunteer. Three C-OPLL types (focal, segmental, continuous) were simulated at 20%, 40%, and 60% occupancy rates. Spinal cord stress was analyzed under nine flexion-extension angles (+20° to -20°). Results: Spinal cord stress increased exponentially at 60% occupancy across all types. Focal ossification produced the highest stress (0.1196 MPa at 60% occupancy/maximum flexion), 30.4% higher than continuous type. At 60% occupancy, the stress sensitivity threshold decreased to ±5° motion. Dural stress consistently exceeded spinal cord parenchyma stress (1.6-2.1 times). Conclusion: In this single-subject finite element model at C4-C5, focal C-OPLL produced the highest peak spinal cord stress at this level. The 60% occupancy rate was identified as a critical biomechanical threshold above which stress increased exponentially and became highly sensitive to minor motion (±5°). These findings are hypothesis-generating and suggest that patients with ≥60% occupancy at C4-C5 may warrant close follow-up. However, because this study is based on a single healthy volunteer, the proposed thresholds require validation through patient-specific models and prospective studies before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.