ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Analysis of intervention effects of three different models on children with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study primarily investigates the intervention effects of different models on children with autism. Methods: A total of 132 autistic children were recruited and assigned to three intervention models: institutional intervention (N=45), family intervention (N=45), and family-institutional intervention (N=42). Comparisons were made of CARS scores before and after intervention across the three groups, as well as developmental quotients in the Gesell Developmental Schedules domains including adaptive behavior, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, language, and personal-social skills. Results: The results indicate that all three intervention models alleviated autistic symptoms in children post-intervention. Notably, the combined family-institutional intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in adaptive abilities, fine motor skills, language, and personal-social relationships. Conclusions: These findings suggest that while all three models effectively improved ASD symptoms, the combined family-institutional intervention was associated with more comprehensive improvements across key developmental domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.