ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026
Challenges of using the Occupational Asthma-specific job exposure matrix to assess occupational exposure and hand eczema.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General population-based studies addressing the association between occupational exposure to irritants and allergens and hand eczema (HE) are limited, or only focus on specific occupations using self-reported exposure data. Objectives: To assess the association between occupational exposure to irritants and allergens and moderate-to-very severe HE, by using the Occupational Asthma-specific job exposure matrix (OasJEM) within the Dutch general population, and to address the applicability of this approach. Methods: Within the Lifelines Cohort Study, participants with moderate-to-very severe HE at worst in the past year vs. no HE in lifetime were identified based on self-reports. The OasJEM was used to link occupations with occupational exposure to irritants and sensitizers, relying on expert-based classification. Results: In total, 56,978 (41.9%) participants were included. The multivariate binary logistic regression analyses showed associations between occupational exposure to irritants [Odds ratio (OR): 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06-1.33)], high molecular weight sensitizers [OR: 1.20 (95% CI: 1.06-1.36)], mites [OR: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.16-1.73)] and disinfectants and cleaning products [1.25 (95% CI: 1.11-1.42)], and moderate-to-very severe HE. Conclusions: While associations between several irritants and allergens and HE were found by applying the OasJEM, which may provide insights into occupational exposure patterns and highlight the general relevance of occupational exposure in relation to HE and its prevention, several methodological and conceptual challenges must be acknowledged. A JEM not specifically designed for HE, like the OasJEM, may not fully capture the complex interplay between occupational exposure and HE, particularly in reflecting direct skin contact, the primary exposure route relevant for HE. However, in the absence of widely available and reliable HE-specific exposure assessment tools, the use of non-HE-specific JEMs may be considered a pragmatic alternative, while acknowledging certain limitations. Future studies should focus on task-based and HE-specific exposure data, providing more accurate insights into occupational exposure and HE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.