ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Clinical and radiographic factors associated with surgical approach selection in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary machine learning analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical and radiographic factors associated with surgeon selection of the direct anterior approach (DAA) versus the posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to explore whether machine learning methods can characterize historical surgical selection patterns. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 patients who underwent primary THA at two institutions, including 61 patients in the PLA group and 37 patients in the DAA group. Patient demographics and preoperative radiographic parameters were collected. Baseline comparisons and univariate logistic regression analyses were conducted using SPSS. A machine learning classification model reflecting historical surgeon-selected approaches was constructed using the XGBoost algorithm, and its performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, five-fold cross-validation, SHAP analysis, and calibration curves. Results: Patients in the DAA group exhibited significantly higher age, soft tissue thickness, neck-shaft angle (NSA), and femoral offset compared to those in the PLA group (all Conclusion: The present study identified several clinical and radiographic factors associated with historical surgeon selection of DAA versus PLA in THA. The machine learning model demonstrated the ability to characterize real-world surgical selection patterns, although it should not be interpreted as recommending the optimal surgical approach for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.