ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Treating depression in Muslim communities: Meta-analysis of three trials of culturally adapted behavioural activation for Muslims (BA-M).
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faith-sensitive depression therapies address a core aspect of cultural values but are not specifically promoted within global mental health policy. This study evaluated a culturally adapted Behavioural Activation intervention for Muslim patients (BA-M) compared with standard treatments across diverse settings. A patient-level meta-analysis combined data from two randomised controlled trials and one feasibility trial, comparing BA-M with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and, in the UK, social interventions. The primary outcome was post-treatment depression severity (PHQ-9) and retention was analysed using Poisson regression alongside qualitative evaluation. A total of 266 participants were recruited (Turkey: 22; Pakistan: 103; UK: 141), with no baseline differences in depression severity between groups. BA-M produced significantly greater reductions in PHQ-9 scores, with an adjusted mean difference of -2.72 (95% CI: -3.93 to -1.51). Engagement was also higher in BA-M (IRR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.18-1.44). Qualitative findings (n = 66) indicated strong support among patients, therapists and service managers, highlighting increased patient motivation and engagement in both Muslim majority and minority contexts. Participants emphasised the importance of religious identity in recovery from depression. The faith-adapted therapy BA-M demonstrates superior effectiveness to CBT and social interventions, supporting the integration of faith-sensitive approaches into global mental health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.