ArticleDiscover mechanical engineering2026
Joint parameter estimation and abrupt change quantification with uncertainty quantification in high degree of freedom dynamical systems via an optimized adaptive unscented Kalman filter.
Article in Discover mechanical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) represents a robust method for estimating latent states and parameters within specified nonlinear equations of dynamic systems under noisy sensor data. Nonetheless, adjusting the filter's hyperparameters (HP)s is essential for effective performance and poses difficulties, especially in systems with many parameters and states to identify, or when it is necessary for the filter to both detect and measure anomaly levels in parameters. Building on the authors previous research on introducing a physics-aware objective function to tune the UKF, this study advances the capabilities of the objective function to tune different adaptive variants of the UKF which facilitates virtual sensing, joint state-parameter estimation, damage quantification and uncertainty quantification under partial observation for systems with many degrees of freedom (DoF) as an open-ended question in structural health monitoring field. To validate the framework, a three DoF damped mass-spring system experiencing a sudden change in physical characteristics is used. Subsequently, the filter's precision in estimating parameters and states is evaluated using a ten DoF system with 40 states and unknown parameters, featuring sparsely placed sensors. Furthermore, the Lorenz attractor under partial observation is used as another case study to highlight why and how the physics-aware objective outperforms other commonly used data-driven objective functions. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework for addressing challenging identification problems in dynamical systems such as tracking sudden changes and evaluating the uncertainties linked to both modeling and measurement, particularly those with limited and noisy sensor data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.