Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553185›Full record

ArticleCommunications earth & environment2026

The differential impact of air pollution on insect chemical communication.

Ben Langford, Jonathan Williams, Jérôme Casas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications earth & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben LangfordUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-5197
Jonathan WilliamsAtmospheric Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9421-1703
Jérôme CasasInsect Biology Research Institute IRBI, University of Tours, CNRS, UMR 7261, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-295X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne chemical communication is vital for insect survival and reproduction, yet its vulnerability to anthropogenic air pollution is poorly understood. We investigate how the physicochemical properties of alarm and sex pheromones influence their atmospheric persistence under pristine and polluted conditions. Using a volatility basis set framework, we show that alarm pheromones-small, volatile, and chemically simple-remain in the gas phase with lifetimes largely unaffected by pollution. In contrast, sex pheromones are larger, less volatile, and more reactive, suffering dramatic reductions in lifetime and spatial range under polluted nocturnal conditions. A key driver of this decline is gas-to-aerosol partitioning, which can remove pheromones from the gas phase faster than chemical degradation. While this may impair detection, aerosol-bound pheromones could be protected from oxidation, potentially extending their lifetime. These findings reveal that air pollution disproportionately disrupts sex pheromone signalling, highlighting a nuanced pathway by which ecological communication is impaired.

Indexed as

Atmospheric chemistryEcosystem ecology

Identifiers

PMID42553185
PMCPMC13433313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.