Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553129›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Aerosol transmission of infectious diseases in poultry: microbiology, pathogenesis, and control measures.

Suresh Burlakoti, Anh Dang Trieu Do, Adnan Alrubaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suresh BurlakotiCenter for Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Anh Dang Trieu DoCenter for Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Adnan AlrubayeCenter for Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansion of intensive poultry production improves productivity but increases the risk of disease transmission. In poultry houses, infectious disease transmission occurs through direct and indirect routes, including surface contamination and vector-borne transmission. Typically, disease control in poultry mostly focuses on direct contact and management-related practices in poultry houses, but there is growing evidence highlighting the significance of the aerosol transmission route - an indirect route of pathogen spread that can impair production performance in poultry. High stocking density in poultry houses, inadequate ventilation, and poor biosecurity measures increase the risk of aerosolized transmission of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens. The efficiency of this route depends on particle size, humidity, temperature, and ventilation, which influence pathogen survival and exposure, and is further compounded by environmental stressors and the site of action within the animal's respiratory system. Given that major pathogens, such as avian influenza virus, infectious bronchitis virus, avian orthoavulavirus 1, and

Indexed as

aerosol transmissioncontrol measuresinfectious diseasemicrobiologypathogenesispoultry

Identifiers

PMID42553129
PMCPMC13433359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.