Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42553104›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2026

Doubly robust and efficient calibration of prediction sets for right-censored time-to-event outcomes.

Rebecca Farina, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, Arun Kumar Kuchibhotla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca FarinaDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University,5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A.
Eric Tchetgen TchetgenDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 265 South 37th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, U.S.A.  ett@wharton.upenn.edu.
Arun Kumar KuchibhotlaDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University,5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A.  arunku@stat.cmu.edu.

Funding

Novel Designs and Methods to Remove Hidden Confounding Bias in Health SciencesR01AG065276 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective is to construct well-calibrated prediction sets for a time-to-event outcome subject to right censoring with guaranteed coverage. Inspired by modern conformal inference, our approach avoids the need for a well-specified parametric or semiparametric survival model. Unlike existing conformal methods for survival data, which assume Type-I censoring with fully observed censoring times, we consider the more common right-censoring setting in which only the censoring time or the event time is observed, whichever comes first. Under a standard conditional independence censoring condition, we propose and analyse several lower prediction bounds for the survival time of a future observation, including inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting and its augmented version based on the semiparametric efficient influence function for the relevant marginal quantile of the outcome, accounting for dependent censoring. We formally establish asymptotic coverage guarantees for the proposed methods and demonstrate, both theoretically and through empirical experiments, that the augmented approach substantially improves efficiency over all other proposed methods. Specifically, its coverage error bound is doubly robust, and therefore of second order, thus ensuring that it is asymptotically negligible relative to the coverage error of the other methods.

Indexed as

Censored dataConformal predictionDouble robustnessInverse-probability-of-censoring weightingPrediction setSemiparametric efficiency theoryTime-to-event outcome

Identifiers

PMID42553104
PMCPMC13433195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.